Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It wasn't actually a fake study. That's the point.

They used the same statistical methods as too many 'honest' groups out there, and got results thereafter.



I disagree. The study was fake because the intent was to deceive. He used flawed methods, but could have used 10 times as sophisticated methods and still would have been able to publish completely invalid results.


I wasn't a fake study, it was a dishonest one.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: