Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Let's assume that we did in fact solve every aspect of aging except somehow for neural plasticity, and that this did in fact cause social progress to freeze.

Would you be okay with killing fifty million people per year, perpetually, in order to achieve some ideal vision of social progress? Wouldn't that make you worse than all the evil dictators in history, combined?

I'd argue that this isn't a position we can seriously consider while maintaining our essential humanity.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: