Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why wouldn't pragmatism produce the results needed? Moving over to Nuclear Power would, without a doubt, solve the climate crisis. Granted, it would introduce other challenges, but we're talking about the lesser of two evils here.


I don't think a rapid wholesale move to nuclear power is any more pragmatic than a rapid move to cut average per capita energy consumption in half.


One solution requires the economy to stall, the other does not. Take your best guess as to which one will have better public support.


Is there a point to ranking impractical solutions?


Impractical, yet exactly what France did..


In a different age, when public opinion on nuclear energy was substantially different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: