I think you read it backwards - that's a possible consequence of P==NP, not P!=N... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		fwip 49 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Has Mythos just broken the deal that kept the inte... I think you read it backwards - that's a possible consequence of P==NP, not P!=NP.

nine_k 49 days ago [–]

Yes, I meant the equality.

We already operate on the assumption that P ≠ NP, so little would change if that were proved.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact