Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

the thing could barely make full grammatical sentences, it's funny to see that even then they were overclaiming the fuck out of their myself


It was a 1.5B parameter model. It was still impressive for 2019, but yeah, it was nothing to worry about.


1.5B and insanely under-trained. Size didn't mean much before the scaling laws papers came out.


imho it was more reasonable back then to claim "agi soon" -- back when nobody really knew how it scales


They weren't claiming it was dangerous because "AGI soon", that didn't come until later.

OpenAI were claiming GPT-2 was too dangerous because it could be used to flood the internet with fake content (mostly SEO spam).

And they were somewhat right. GPT-2 was very hard to prompt, but with a bit of effort it could spit out endless pages that were good enough to fool a search engine, and even a human at a first glance (you were often several paragraphs in before you realised it was complete nonsense.


we essentially have AGI right now brother


we got the A and G parts, just missing the I part but it’s coming :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: