Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Meta's Broken API: How Facebook Is Killing Small Developer Innovation
5 points by Jvit 6 months ago | hide | past | favorite | 6 comments

  Meta's Broken API is Killing Small Developers

  I built Socialync, a social media scheduler. Meta approved my app for Advanced Access      
  with all needed permissions.

  Ready to launch? Not quite.

  The Problem

  When users connect Facebook Pages:
  {"data": []}

  Zero pages. Every time. 100% failure rate.

  But it works perfectly when I test it. My pages show up, posts schedule successfully.      

  The catch? Meta gives app admins privileged access without telling them.

  Users and I have identical setups - same Business Portfolio, same permissions, same        
  OAuth flow. Yet the API only works for me (the admin), not actual users.

  Why Users See "Connected" But It Doesn't Work

  When users authorize Socialync:
  -  Facebook shows "Connected"
  -  All permissions "Granted"
  -  OAuth completes successfully

  But the API returns empty: {"data": []}

  Meta blocks it at the API level. The connection exists but Business Portfolio pages        
  need business_management permission that isn't mentioned upfront.

  Like having a concert ticket but the door requires a VIP pass they didn't tell you         
  about.

  The Real Requirement

  After weeks debugging: Business Portfolio pages require business_management permission.    

  Problems:
  1. Not documented clearly
  2. Can't discover until you've built everything
  3. All creators/businesses use Business Portfolio
  4. Approval takes 2-4 weeks
  5. App broken for 100% of users meanwhile

  Even Buffer and Hootsuite fail for these users.

  The "Support" Experience

   Email support - doesn't exist Phone - doesn't exist Chat - advertisers only
  Forums - confused developers Bug reports - black hole

  Meta abandoned small developers.

  The Economics

  Meta: $117B revenue, 71,000 employees, no basic developer support.

  Why? Small developers don't generate ad revenue. Only large enterprises matter.

  What Happens Daily

  Scenario 1: Developer builds 6 months → Doesn't work → Abandons projectScenario 2:
  Startup raises funding → Permission walls → Burns runway → FailsScenario 3: Company        
  builds for Facebook → Impossible → Pivots away

  What Meta Should Do

  1. Honest docs about business_management requirement
  2. Test with non-admin accounts BEFORE approval
  3. Real support staff
  4. Transparent review process
  5. 30-day grace period

  Won't happen. Meta doesn't care.

  The Message

  Meta's platform is hostile to small developers:
  - Incomplete documentation
  - Opaque approvals
  - No support
  - Hidden restrictions

  They want you to buy ads, not build apps.

  What Now?

  Requested business_management. Waiting 2-4 weeks.

  Meanwhile: app broken for 100% of users. Launch on hold. Users frustrated. Meta doesn't    
   care.

  Building on Meta? Don't.

  Use Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok - platforms that:
  - Provide accurate docs
  - Offer real support
  - Value developers

  Small developers are not welcome at Meta.


It Burns me so much to have to deal with this, when I look at other API's for other social medias....

You can log in and instantly connect your account (aslong as you agree to the scopes), but when it comes to meta you have to hula hoop and hop around through business suite, professional accounts, pages, assets, portfolios and more....

This is not okay.


What do you think their reason for this is? And why others don't make their's as difficult?


Twitter’s API isnt any better. And Linkedin.. well dont even get me started on their “API”


this text looks like LLM-generated…


Yes, flag and move on


>> Small developers are not welcome at Meta

You took a long time to come to a conclusion that is common knowledge;

"Don't build things which are dependent on someone else's platform."

This is a valuable life lesson, and one which (unfortunately) has to be re-learned over and over again. (Ask the Farmville folks).

When you build on someone else's platform you are subject to their whims, their changes in direction, their API restrictions, changes, whatever.

Meta will do none of the things you suggest. Because (and this will shock you) none of these suggestions are new. Which makes sense - external developers are not their priority.

And if you think Twitter, LinkedIn, etc are any better I have a bridge to sell you...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: