Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Planning for an AWS outage is a complete waste of time and energy for most companies. Yes it does happen but very rarely to the tune of a few hours every 5-10 years.

Not only that, but as you're seeing with this and the last few dozen outages... when us-east-1 goes down, a solid chunk of what many consumers consider the "internet" goes down. It's perceived less as "app C is down" and more is "the internet is broken today".



Isn't the endpoint of that kind of thinking an even more centralized and fragile internet?


To be clear, I'm not advocating for this or trying to suggest it's a good thing. That's just reality as I see it.

If my site's offline at the same time as the BBC has front page articles about how AWS is down and it's broken half the internet... it makes it _really_ easy for me to avoid blame without actually addressing the problem.

I don't need to deflect blame from my customers. Chances are they've already run into several other broken services today, they've seen news articles about it, and all from third parties. By the time they notice my service is down, they probably won't even bother asking me about it.

I can definitely see this encouraging more centralization, yes.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: