Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It has some good points but it reads like it was written by AI. Only the typos and grammatical errors lead me to assume a human may have written it.


I don't know, it's hard to tell sometimes. I thought it was making some pretty reasonable points.


Not AI specific but Joel On Software covered a lot of the same material and thinking, written a lot better, about 20 years ago - but that is because this is an evergreen problem - getting leaders to understand that a prototype is just a test or a demo, no a path to the solution.

A previous company had a rule that all prototypes were built with the express intention of throwing them away - no prototype code could ever make its way to live.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: