Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Here's the thing, cities do not get cheaper when density increases. The reasons are complicated, but the end result is that not a single large city in Europe, US, or Japan decreased the housing costs by "just building more".

If you want to decrease costs, you have exactly two options:

1. Decrease the city population.

2. Build _more_ cities, or new suburbs.



> the end result is that not a single large city in Europe, US, or Japan decreased the housing costs by "just building more".

This is just factually inaccurate? I don't think we can meaningfully discuss anything if you're going to lie about major claims like this.


Care to provide a counterexample?

Outside of 2008, when all the prices dropped, and relatively recently (within ~40 years).


Austin is a very recent example.


See point 1. Next?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: