Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agree and came here to say as much.

Devil's advocate, assuming limited resources for the program, it makes more sense to invest them in younger cohorts in terms of total ROI to society.

However, surely doesn't satisfy the principle of equality under the law. Alas



I don't know of anyone qualified to judge someones "ROI to society." That is a totally fucked up outlook. What next, eugenics?



Deciding ROI to society is what the government does.

Consider questions like: Why did we spend so much money trying on a Covid vaccine but not to cure gall bladder cancer? Why does eminent domain exist? Why do young men have to register for selective service?


Welcome to reality, population: everyone.

Whether you like it or agree with it or not, the math has to be done at some point since we are not (yet?) a post-scarcity species.

How do you think things like life insurance policies and wrongful death awards are calculated?


They're called actuaries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuary


I could see a very particular way of interpreting the ROI of a person that's offensive.

But they were clearly talking about ROI of the job training.


That is literally the job of politicians.


They said "qualified", heheh ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: