I'm sorry to break it to you, but you're really not. Commercial surveillance is exactly this imposition of value judgements onto people without their consent.
I myself am a libertarian. A government is merely a large corporation that is impractical to opt out of. Conversely, corporations that are impractical to opt out of constitute de facto government. Data protection laws like the GDPR attempt to constrain the power of corporations so they don't rise to that level, which ultimately constrains the amount of government.
A government is much more than a large corporation that is "impractical" to opt out of. They are the sole arbiter of legitimate force, and the sole entity that can govern your behavior in places you have a right to be. Corporations are perfectly practical to opt out of, as demonstrated by the many people who do. Find me one person who doesn't pay taxes and doesn't go to jail. I know plenty of people who don't interact with FAANG at all. Corporations will never rise to the legitimate use of force. If they do, they'll be governments.
> They are the sole arbiter of legitimate force, and the sole entity that can govern your behavior in places you have a right to be
This fully depends on what you include in your definitions.
Imagine this: A company owns a vast area of land. You agree to contract with this company in order to be on their land. This contract includes things like using physical force against you if you violate other terms spelled out in the contract (just as you can contract to have violence done to you at a BDSM club). The contract defines a technical term "right", the definition of which spells out some things you're positively allowed to do, and is somewhat harder to amend but not impossible. The terms allow you to sublease a bit of their land for your exclusive use. Your sole way to terminate this contract is to completely leave the company's land and pay off any balance you owe. Call this company USG and it is indistinguishable from the United States Government.
> Find me one person who doesn't pay taxes and doesn't go to jail
Most people who have under the table income and don't report it. Same as how it's often possible to get around breach of contract when your counterparty doesn't find out. Model vs reality. And note how similar the requirements for keeping your income unreported mirror the requirements for avoiding transitive association with a given corporation.
> I know plenty of people who don't interact with FAANG at all
1. There are likely still surveillance profiles being kept on them. 2. It's hard to believe said people use the web for anything, given the prevalence of Google Tag Manager and CAPTCHAs. 3. More entrenched than FAANG are Equifax and LexisNexis, which are even harder to distance yourself from. I'd say it's easier to renounce your citizenship of most countries than it is to avoid the worst of the surveillance companies.
> Corporations will never rise to the legitimate use of force
You keep using this word legitimate, which entirely depends on perspective. I would say that it is plainly illegitimate to throw someone in a cage for smoking a plant, and so calling government inherently legitimate is a bit dubious.
> Corporations will never rise to the legitimate use of force. If they do, they'll be governments.
Corporations, as creatures of law, are an apparatus of government. And they’ve participate in the legitimate use of force from the very dawn of corporations as a thing.
I myself am a libertarian. A government is merely a large corporation that is impractical to opt out of. Conversely, corporations that are impractical to opt out of constitute de facto government. Data protection laws like the GDPR attempt to constrain the power of corporations so they don't rise to that level, which ultimately constrains the amount of government.