Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You wrote "That is inaccurate", but you didn't cite a single inaccuracy in the gp comment. You wrote some other sentences, but they don't appear to contradict anything gp wrote.


The GP claimed litigation was over. The parent claims it isn't over. Oftentimes higher courts decide a specific question pertaining to a case, not the whole case. Just because a higher court clarifies something doesn't mean litigation is over - it means the lower courts can continue with that point now clarified and/or corrected.


Thank you for the further explanation. I see what you mean.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: