Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No agenda. As I stated originally, it's not appropriate to hold up BTC as anything other than an extremely speculative gamble. I simply disagreed with the top post which offered up an "appeal to authority" -- an SEC-sanctioned ETF based on BTC -- that shrouded BTC in an air of 'investability' that is 100% not true. BTC is a horrifically dangerous placement of money. And the problem is, BTC fans -- most of them -- act like they don't know just how risky and speculative BTC is, and its near-zero utility as a medium of exchange.

I'm telling you, get hyper-objective about the danger of converting highly-accepted stores of value into BTC.

For example, most gamblers say to themselves:

"I know I can/will lose money gambling. But my purpose for gambling is not to invest and get a good risk-adjusted return. My objective for gambling is to enjoy the thrill of the process -- and the thrill of gambling is worth more to me than money I can lose."

And many gamblers would add to that by saying "I'm only taking $5000 to Vegas this weekend -- when that's gone, I'm done."

Gamblers view a super-high-risk of loss as paying for a day at DisneyWorld. They lose their money on the day. But the thrill of the rides makes up for it.

My only 'agenda' is BTC users need to understand the risks they're taking. And far too many do not know.

Don't lose money on BTC unless you know you're in it for entertainment -- like going to Vegas or Disneyland -- and that you're fully expecting to lose a lot or all your money.

Just ask this guy -- Kolin Burges, who traveled from England to Japan to confront Mark Karpeles about his missing 200,000 pounds (about $300,000 roughly):

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/02/26/article-2568258-1B...



All speculation is risk. BTC is in no special category in that regard. But keep saving us from ourselves if you wish.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: