Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zqna's commentslogin

If we could send all the terraformers from earth to mars we would so solve both problems at the same time


Sounds like a plan.


I wish them same regulation would be enforced on toothbrushes


I wonder if there is a universal limit for speed per lines of code. The one the we think the light has


And we are running out of time


He might not escape, but my grandson stands a reasonably good chance at this time.


If singularity premise is correct, then i think it should must already had happened in our cluster of the universe. Since it hasn't yet, then there are 3 options. 1st: earth and earthlings are special, which is too egocentric notion to be taken seriously. 2nd: we are being observed for entertainment by high conciousness. That could explain a lot, though this removes agency and prevents us from reaching that moment on our own (but maybe the observers are curious to find that out). 3rd: the extinction and annihilation of so-called intelligence once it obliterates all the resources in vicinity. Of course there is option number 4, but ultimately the question, what is the point of that?


This is basically a version of the Fermi Paradox, which, well, has a lot of different answers. A lot. One of my favorites is that humanity actually is one of the early tech civilizations, due to insufficient phosphorus in earlier phases of the universe. But also, there are a lot of ways to have a technological singularity, and many of them have no particular reason to be visible at astronomical distances.


That's also my take. The universe is expected to last for trillions of years and only 13 billions years have passed. Life on earth evolved surprisingly fast after reaching the necessary conditions, some recent research on LUCA estimating less than 300 millions years. I believe there are others out there, but too far yet for communication.


> and many of them have no particular reason to be visible at astronomical distances.

Or to want to talk to meat.

https://youtu.be/T6JFTmQCFHg


...sure. To be clear, ETs wanting to talk to us is not necessarily a prerequisite to being detectable by us, which is the more relevant question.


But wanting not to talk to us might be a reason to make themselves hard to detect. Kind of moving to the quieter place when you can’t find anyone interesting at a party.



That's your answer? "Next time"?


It's funny to think that all this discussion would not be happening if not for naive idealism embraced by software people fo decades, which enabled sharing everything they made after working hours for free and for everyone. That all it was hijacked by a handful of rich and not very altruistic people to enslave everyone comes as a big surprise. Who would have thought. I guess we arent that smart after all


No worries, tomorrow it shall be back


America. Where hypocracy is a virtue


Yes.

Its weird having a long time military part time job and a software full time job. Military people tend to be extremely confrontational, and usually not in any way negative. Software people tend to greatly fear confrontation in any form. It really feels like a form of cowardice on repeat. The weirdness is hyper amplified when the manager is the person who is most intimidated and fearful of one-on-ones. That's American social cultural and why so many people take anti-anxiety medications when they shouldn't.


Yes, you should discuss only what is allowed. If you use the technology to dissent against your rulers, then it should be switched off (until you come back to your sense and submit yourself to the mercy of mulas).


We could have euro championship, no problem. Any other boycoting country could also join.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: