Where in the constitution does it say that corporate entities have any rights at all?

Corporations inherit their rights and privileges from the people in them. Because a corp is in fact just a series of individuals in a trenchcoat. (This would make immediate sense if we had not let grammar decay and you implicitly knew corp = plural)

Those people did not lose their individual rights; they are still free to donate using their money. Corporations are not people even if they are made up of people.

The people making up the corporation can all vote as individuals and the corporation itself has no vote. This is no different.

people are corporations. I hardly exist as an individual in america. I do not own anything, my company does (my company employs only me and soon my daughter when she is of age), I do not buy anything, my company does. I don’t have phone service or internet service or practically anything under my name. and my company (me) has about the same rights as you, an individual, except of course a lot more cause capitalism be capilizing :)

Ok, none of that makes HTTP/1.1 any more secure.

Can you hack anyone other than yourself with that attack?

>But this isn't a realistic future given present infrastructure.

Neither is self driving.

So far as I can tell, the problem with self driving has nothing to do with the infrastructure, but rather that machine learning doesn't generalise quickly from even "merely" a million times as many examples as humans get to experience.

I think it's safe to assume everything this regime does "may not be entirely legal".

Elite would be a great game if it wasn't for the frustrating and terrible game design.

I wouldn't have thought you could do it by whacking together some 2kg rusty iron balls and aluminum foil but you can. I wouldn't try it inside of a building I didn't want to burn down.

I can do 48A @ 240V with my wall connector. It's also very convenient.

I do as well with a NEMA?

Breaker size =/= charging speed. Breakers are oversized for safety reasons. The Wall Connector is on a 60A breaker and charges at 48A. NEMA 14-50 outlets are on 50A breakers but can't charge your car at 48A. 40 iirc, and the mobile connector that comes with the car maxes out at 32A.

I've had both setups and whether the full amperage charger is worth it or not depends on your use case. If you're just going to plug it in overnight, it doesn't matter. It's about an hour's difference for a top up. If you're going to wait for your car to charge and unplug it because you share the charger or have to run an extension over a public sidewalk, then the faster speed is worth it.

I don’t think the mobile charger allows more than 32A continuous over NEMA, even on a 50A receptacle

There are a lot of different mobile chargers, if you don't like the specs on the Tesla charger buy a different one. Though do beware that cheap 50A receptacles cannot handle 50 amps continuous. They are for stoves (max 40A), or welders (low duty cycle since you spend more time in setup then welding - assembly lines use better receptacles)

I can confirm this. Our Model 3 doesn't charge as fast using a NEMA 14-50 plug connected via the Tesla-provided mobile charger.

When we moved to a new house, we bought a Tesla wall charger, and it indeed charges at higher amps, but I don't know if the extra speed has necessarily been worth it since we primarily charge the car overnight.

Think of it less like a consistent foreign policy and more like the biggest insider trading grift in American history.

Not feel, know.

If you at all understood any of those three things you would know that they are all closely related.