Claude design AI slob.

No way they got that many stars in that little time. buy.fans must run a special right now.

Before AI I would spend multiple days mapping out my database tables and queries while now I ask AI to propose multiple different approaches and I pick the best one. But then on the other hand I’m working on 10 features at the same time and have to carefully look through them. But I can see that I’m totally dependent on the AI now. Creating a full plan by yourself feels like a waste of time, since you know the AI can create the same or better plan in a split second. So when Claude is down, I end up not being productive at all.

> Creating a full plan by yourself feels like a waste of time, since you know the AI can create the same or better plan in a split second.

It IS a waste of time if your only goal is the creation of the plan. However, one must be very self-aware of their goals because if one of the unacknowledged ones is to retain the ability to create plans, then you must continue creating plans yourself.

OpenAI and Anthropic are killing startups and mature companies left and right. They will always have the cost advantage.

From the store bought orange juices, I think the Trader joes one is the closest to tasting like fresh-squeezed.

Can you include .next and .turbo folders. Mine were 300gb large.

great idea, thank you! will do in the next update

I have been testing it in my app all morning, and the results line up with 4.6 Sonnet. This is just a "vibe" feeling with no real testing. I'm glad we have some real competition to the "frontier" models.

it feels like between K2.6 and GLM5.1 we have Sonnet level intelligence at roughly Haiku level pricing. Which is great.

I'm hoping that Anthropic will be able to release an updated Haiku soon and they really need something that is 1/3-1/5 the price of Haiku to compete with the truly cheaper models (Gemma-4 is really good at this range).

https://auxx.ai Yet another "AI CRM" Started over a year ago working on it part time. Its coming together. https://auxx.ai

What do you mean by "onsite testing"? Wouldn't this be part of the pre-submittal process?

This may work on a small scale, not in most commercial use cases. A typical deck pour (400cy) will pour at 70-80cy/hr. you got 9-10cy/truck. Meaning you have 7 to 8 minutes to back in the truck, empty it into the hopper and leave. You barely have time to add water to the mix. Most high-volume concrete plants are "dry-batch", which means all the ingredients get dumped into the drum and the concrete will get mixed while driving to the project site. Also, changing mixes on the fly will not "fly". No one is going to authorize the adjustment, because what happens when the mix doesn't meet specs... It will need to get chipped out.

The target audience of these trucks is sub-10cy jobs. It allows companies to cater to smaller customers at a premium.

In the large road projects I've seen they bring a concrete plant to the job. Buildings still get trucks coming in.

I highly recommend the 9 episode miniseries podcast The Big Dig from GBH. Their mismanagement of the concrete was wild.