Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more falleng0d's commentslogin

Don’t attack the messenger, attack the message.


A more applicable cliché might be,"Consider the source."


Oh yes, let's everyone stop posting links to twitter because someone disagrees with the political views of the owner. So much for having some tolerance right?

please keep this kind of rhetoric to reddit


I've wished people stopped posting links to twitter the moment twitter started requiring people to create/log into an account in order to view anything. I think the political concerns are every bit as valid as concerns over accessibility and privacy, but ultimately there are a lot of good reasons to avoid linking to twitter.


Triggered much? I’m expressing my free speech by refusing to use his neo nazi website and encouraging others to avoid it too. Why do I have to tolerate him?


In all seriousness, drawing a line once we reach Nazis is absolutely fair. That is not something to tolerate.


If you need context on this, try: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/grok-praises-hit...

There's always someone saying, 'not yet' when others draw a line. Question is, are you going to be that someone, or are you too going to draw a line?

I left Twitter/X when Musk did that Nazi salute. I have not returned. That was a line.


The links appear to be broken today.

Perhaps X links are ephemeral?


There are some things that you should not be tolerated. Greedy, manipulative, lying bullies are one of those things.


Meanwhile supporting X and its owner is rhetoric that actually deserves to be kept not even to Reddit but to 4chan/b https://deadline.com/2025/07/elon-musks-ai-chatbot-grok-prai...


It's not racist. It's all about the intention; as a company, you don't want to expend a single extra dime to comply with the regulations. since the population is pretty much homogeneous you can just blur out the Japanese and you are pretty much guaranteed to cover 99% of the cases.

Business don't exist to respect or care about people they exist to generate profit so the idea of a business "respecting" something is not even realistic.

The law is what outlines what are the limits and guarantees the basics rights to everyone.


So, people are being treated differently entirely on the basis of their race - but it's not racist because they're lazily cutting corners in following a regulation? If they actually cared why would they not just blur all faces instead of looking at their race to decide whether or not to do it?

> Business don't exist to respect or care about people they exist to generate profit so the idea of a business "respecting" something is not even realistic.

People work at businesses, and those people make decisions that are influenced by their personal feelings. In a free market people will boycott them for doing bad things. Racist businesses being outted, receiving bad press and losing revenue - in this scenario it sounds like the japanese are okay with it. Being respectful is profitable.


it's funny when you imagine that now we're using AI ad-blockers to block AI generated content


This is actually amazing. I wish there was something similar that for windows's keypirinha[1].

specifically would be interesting to have something like that for k8s resources.

1. https://keypirinha.com/


Thank you for the feedback!

Hopefully, someone will do it, or perhaps you can try replicating the same approach for Keypirinha.


you can use the filesystem mcp and have it use the read file tool to read the files in full on call


You can use Copilot and a bunch of new Agents such as augment and firebender which are very good.

In the worst case you’ll still be able to use AI tooling similar or equal to what you have in VS code. Even Windsurf has an JetBrains plugin.


Maybe they should ask the new models to generate a better name for themselves. It's getting quite confusing.


Why move away though? The cloud subsidizes for "free" a lot of powerful services that the average user can only dream of self-hosting.

And the price is what? Your browsing history? Personalized Ad's? Provided you don't AdBlock that is!

I like the symbiotic relationship. I do believe in safeguarding yourself from getting locked out of your life due to your Google acc getting banned but outside of that I see no harm in getting free service in exchange for data. It's a fair deal.


And the price is what? Your browsing history? Personalized Ad's? Provided you don't AdBlock that is!

Regardless of what you think of using your private data in exchange for free services, the problem with the cloud owned by US companies is that to us outside the US it seems like any kind of blackmail now seems fair game.

Since Vance threatened to drop NATO support if the EU regulates Musk's platforms [1], temporarily holding hostage our data to 'win' a trade war does not seem that far-fetched anymore.

Also, if the US ends up trying to make good on their threat to annex Canada or Greenland, then we are strongly dependent on a hostile state. We learned some lessons from being dependent on Russian gas.

[1] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...


Whether the price is fair or not is obviously up to you. I personally don't like the deal, so I would rather use alternatives.

IMO your quotation marks around _free_ do a lot of heavy lifting.


I wonder how much faster DOOM will run on this


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: