Just because you don't have access doesn't mean that people with access should be disallowed from discussing it. It just means you can't really discuss the article, but that's never stopped anyone from commenting before
Have you considered these people in general aren't some outsiders out to attack you or your favorite language?
The people who do end up making and using type checkers are people who have or are actively using these dynamic languages and found out that they CAN help THEM with preventing bugs.
Also, really? 22 years in which not one type-related error happened? Never? I don't want to say I don't believe you, but I really don't.
Its funny, I've noticed the same thing, but did not come to the same conclusion.
I currently don't have work access to Claude Code, but most of my teammates do. Watching from the outside, the cycle seems to look like this:
1. Experience some success, which hooks you into relying on AI.
2. The AI keeps failing at some task, but you don't want to stop. Keep trying over and over again.
3. Run out of tokens and take a break.
Now, sometimes 1 doesn't happen. Sometimes 2 doesn't happen. 3 is a certainty though.
Now, if you told me that the productivity gain from 1 is enough to offset the loss from 2 and 3, I could believe you. But I also wouldn't be surprised if it didn't.
As I work with Claude more and gain a feel for its capabilities, I tend to run into 2 far less often, as I'll decompose my messages more for the current model limitations. The threshold also changes each release.
It's how Spotify started. And CrunchyRoll. And slightly metaphorically Uber. And in a way Netflix. Turns out you can't scale if you never offer anything of value to customers and therefore never get customers.
I don't. I was recently doing some searching for information I thought AI would be good for: fuzzy natural language search with some conditions. And it was, but ...
Gemini at least is not great at citing and picking sources. Or providing multiple sources for the same thing.
It tends to stop at threes. So if you want more, you have to prompt it uselessly, like: "any more?"
Assuming that there are infinite suckers with cash to spend. It's entirely possible (if unlikely) that the market is not big enough to cover the training costs. Especially for multiple companies all burning insane amount of money on the regular.
I'm in these stats I think. But mostly because I was trying to do an exact search ("something to search") and discovered that google just ignores it.
There's a local search engine with a motto that translates to something like "Find what you don't know." Google has seemingly adapted "find what you don't want."
I hit it accidentally all the time. Any time I have to temporarily one-hand it with my right hand. The sides are rounded and smooth and there are buttons on the back and top of the side. The power button is very sensitive as well and doesn't require a hard press; it responds instantly.
You would have to go out of your way to grip it in a way you could press it. You don't need to move your hand to lift it, it's controller shape after all. Or you can grip it along the bottom edge. And even gripping the top edge I just can't find a way you could accidentally hit it. It's flush.
The only time I've accidentally turned it on/off is when I've been clawing it out of the carrying case.
Edit: Wait, are you gripping the bottom and top edge at the same time, over the screen? Why? It's huge.
Yes, top and bottom at the same time, from the back or front. I have giant hands and that's a comfortable grip for me. Anything else feels like it's going to slip and drop one-handed.
Well, first of all, stop lying. These people aren't leaving the company. They were fired. They were removed. Leaving sounds voluntary.
Then, this might be a cultural thing, but I don't want niceties and flowery language. Give it to me straight. It's not "we're rebuilding". We're not rebuilding anything. We're broke. If you're broke just say that.
Step 2, don't use "leaving the company" as a euphemism for "getting laid off", as the former implies employee agency and choice they don't actually have.
The entire post is a green-beige sludge of corpspeak, euphemisms, and AI slop. Who fucking talks like this anyway?
That's on me; I set the bar too low. When I asked "How", I was hoping for someone to literally write up an alternative and better way of phrasing this, which would still work as part of a corporate press release.
reply