Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dimgl's commentslogin

I think sleep apnea would have killed me had I not gotten the sleep study. I was having 100+ events in the span of a few hours. Anyhow, I use the CPAP everyday. I don't snore anymore and I have maybe 1 event a night. Incredible machine.

This is an overly negative response to a genuine solution. There are a million reasons you shouldn't do X or Y.

More than likely GitHub would have to maintain their own internal wallet solution for this, which is a big engineering lift. But we're all just having a discussion.


  > to a genuine solution
Except it isn't. It is a lazy solution and impractical one

  > More than likely GitHub would have to maintain their own internal wallet solution
Great, so you even found one of the main issues, which pushes off the problem to a third party which makes it an impossible solution for anyone but GitHub (still a problematic "solution" though)

  > This is an overly negative response
Yet it isn't because even as you noted it's not realistic to implement.

There's two types of lazy, and this is the kind that creates more work, not less


> There's two types of lazy, and this is the kind that creates more work, not less

Well put. Thanks for taking the time to call this out. Your two comments here are balm for the mental anguish and annoyance I went through reading the so-full-of-misplaced-confidence original comment.


> you're unfairly conflating things and putting the blame for a lack of care or understanding on tailwind vs on the dev themselves. nothing about tailwind forces you to build inaccessible or "div soup" apps

+1


Hey, that's cool. Does this support conversation lookups? Like, "find this conversation we talked about yesterday"? I built a similar tool to this, although Regent seems much more elegant: https://github.com/divmgl/clancey/


cool!

actually not at the moment - would be nice to add it. i think the core of re_gent allows it very naturally, feel free to push it if want :)


Why do you assume it's botted? Just open up Codex on GPT 5.4 and point it at your codebase.


slop


Vagueposting in Hacker News?


In short: no.

Nothing comes close, in my opinion. Sonnet and Opus are still the best models. The Codex variants of the GPT models are also great. I've tried MiniMax, GLM, Qwen and Kimi and for anything even remotely complex these models seriously struggle.


Thank you for the honest answer.

Yes, this is the conclusion I've come to as well. I don't want to continue supporting OpenAI nor Anthropic, but the other models don't seem to be anywhere close yet, despite the hype.


Is this spam? It's incomprehensible.


Slop is just what you are not expending calories on to bring into your cognitive workspace.


I doubt it's this. This was an `npm` misconfiguration.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: