Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chillfox's commentslogin

Might be bribes and subsidies


Just let go of the entire R&D team and then you have a 50% margin business.

UPDATE: Also bad news, you need to let go of all of sales and marketing and G&A. And THEN it's a 50% margin business.


This also shows that 2025 paid for 2024.

Unless they increased their spending even more, "all they have to do" is cover 2025 with the 2026 revenue?


One of these two should be the main link tbh

The Zitrons was main link yeasterday. Most claimed it is nothing burger and Zitron bullshits, has nothing there and is annoying. Shrug.

From the Ars Technica article... OpenAI’s headline “net loss” number of just over $5 billion in 2024 ballooned to nearly $39 billion in 2025. But the 2025 number includes a significant accounting charge related to investor valuations that shifted amid the company’s 2025 conversion to a for-profit structure. The Financial Times cites “a person familiar with the matter” in reporting that this non-recurring charge was approximately $30 billion and that OpenAI’s 2025 net loss amounted to a more reasonable-looking $8 billion without it.

Huh? Where did $30 billion go?


Written off.

They might not have spent $30b but they likely valued their asset base at >>> $30b+ and had to adjust that at the time of converting to for profit, is how I read it.

“One time non-recurring” is also just accounting double speak that lets executives cover up dumb stuff while sounding plausibly OK.


Profit and loss tracks changes to the fair price of purchasing the business, not operational cash flow. The $30b didn't go anywhere since it's not cash flow, it's acknowledging that someone who purchases OpenAI today would be on the hook for $30b more of future ownership dilution than before 2025.

They promised the former investors $30b in equity, which is like taking a loan accounting wise.

Not really, you can just get a smaller unrestricted model to prompt the bigger one

yeah, they don't want it to be able to find security bugs that can be exploited.

Isn’t that just because people started doing chargebacks, and refunds are cheaper than chargebacks?

good intentions or not, they are letting people have their money back - not that this would put a dent in current enterprise spend anyways

Nobody who works at Anthropic is a good person.

Just look at any interview with Amodei, he gets super excited/happy every time he gets to talk about his tech making people unemployed.

The guy loves firing people not at his company.

Deliberately trying to cause mass poverty and starvation by firing as many people as possible and being excited about it is cartoon villain stuff.

Anyone who works at Anthropic is basically a henchman to a cartoon villain.


But we must not forget that the reason they are admired is that our society has rewarded people like that. Our society is fascinated by people like Amodei precisely because, despite being contradictory, we have rewarded those who make money and pull up the ladder behind them.

Also, even if a company is an evil organization, I think people can still serve that evil to make a living. Evil is easy; good is difficult. Most people, rather than being good but poor, would rather be evil but wealthy.

This is the image of an entrepreneur that our capitalist society has wanted all along, so he is simply positioning himself accordingly.


I got my mum onto Apple devices (mac and iPhone) over a decade ago, and support dropped sharply in the first 6 months. These days it's incredibly rare that she needs help with anything, and she does more on the computer than she ever did.

The mac has helped her improve here computer skills and confidence in a way that Windows never did.


Almost all the corporate security professionals I have dealt with have been tool runners with no more than Helpdesk level skills.


As someone with over 30 years experience in computer security, both in corporate as well as boutique security and startup shops, who has been consistently fighting this trend, and recently bearing witness to and engaging in the current AI surge: I can say with absolute confidence that it is only getting and going to get even worse yet.

People like me who know there is a better way are getting pushed harder to lean on AI tooling even though we know that it is making things worse. This isn’t just because our founder/funding overlords are pressing us to do it. The sheer volume of new mission critical code being pumped out enabled by vibe coding is also leaving us little choice but to lean in too just to try and keep up.

We can all see it as clear as day: The tech isn’t ready for any of this. But nobody wants to hear that and everyone is marching off the cliff together anyway. We’re all going to land in the same waste pit together. Raise a glass and whimper.


AI is far better at security than the majority of security professionals. It is a net positive.

People constantly compare AI to this very rare expert human rather than the reality of who is already employed. Experts like you are a major culprit of this. And it puts you at odds with yourself to both admit the industry is full of subpar workers and then lament that they will be replaced with workers that are better, but still worse than you.

What is wrong with someone to make them think in this manner? Is it just a kneejerk response with little thought? Is it ego? Is it a coping mechanism? I find it very strange and interesting and annoying.


I also don’t like your framing, here.

We need experts to know when AI is wrong, which it is all the time.

Earlier this week someone commented here that we shouldn’t expect a language model to know that you need to drive a car to a car wash, to wash a car.

So then, what do we expect it to know? Who’s responsible for when it’s wrong?

Also, why can’t Mythos just fix all these issues itself if it’s so smart. And test them to make sure they work?


I actually agree somewhat with jatora. However a large segment of the top ~20% of security folks are being forced to become reverse centaurs, as opposed to centaurs (disempowered vs empowered) due to the factors I mentioned. I genuinely see value in the tech, but it is currently being deployed recklessly and stupidly.

> why can’t Mythos just fix all these issues itself if it’s so smart. And test them to make sure they work?

“Why”: because you didn’t ask it. It’s not its job in this case.

You don’t hire an accountant and tell them “why can’t you fix my cash-flow problems and make me money if you’re so smart”


Ah ok, sure. The difference being the model should know how to do both based on what I’ve been told.

So why didn’t Anthropic ask it for me?


You are leaping to the assumption that I don’t actually believe in the tech. This is incorrect. I am griping with the way it is being recklessly and stupidly deployed by poeople who really don’t know what they’re doing.

That means you aren't high enough up to deal with the non helpdesk level security people.


True. It is a well-known fact that braincells per capita, and technical competence and understanding rapidly increase the higher you are on the management ladder.


You don’t have to limit yourself to the tiny models with the OpenCode Go plan, you can get a lot of usage from the bigger models if you keep the cache hot.

I am about 85% through my quota with 9 days left before refresh and have just used over 1B tokens, mostly DeepSeek V4 Pro, but also a little mimo 2.5 pro and kimi k2.6


For sure, I've been flipping between flash/pro (or the equivalent for other families), been trying to stick to one family per project as a way to test them out independently over longer periods and more realistic/diverse tasks. I've definitely spent more quota on pro and pushed more tokens through flash.


And yet, Steam is on Linux.

If the Linux market is large enough for steam to support it, then it should be big enough for a movie store to support.


Valve made the Linux market work by bloody persistence, because Gabe Newell saw the Microsoft Store as a threat to turn Windows into a walled garden (which would have hurt Steam a lot). It's not the Linux user base as such which attracted Valve.

But it's really beside the point, since supporting games on an OS is a hell of a lot harder than supporting video. You're right that movie stores have no excuse - except the control argument, working the other way than it did for Valve.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: