Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ZeroAurora's commentslogin

Not all people follow the trends of AI. The tarpit might work a year ago, but unfortunately not now.

Also most users of DN42 are not really engineers, they are more enthusiasts


It's zh-cn by the way, and you can switch to that language in the article's navbar


And I really joined the DN42 network after reading this article. Absolute cinema.

Offtopic: If you are interested in Computer Networking you definitely don't want to miss out DN42.


no one says that explicitly, but everyone wants to have some fun :)


Good job to Pydantic team! I wish the fork will go further after the upstream freeze.


Although it is not OSI approved, the license theoretically didn't add any more restrictions beyond attribution, which stays in line with The Open Source Definition.


That's debateable. How about, e.g, "10. No provision of the license may be predicated on any [...] style of interface."

Anyway, if it was clear cut, it shouldn't be difficult to get it approved.

These kinds of discussions show why it's a pain to use non standard licenses.


Prisma Next will be... Drizzle

(not that much though)


I love the idea of DOs and I'm happy to see an OSS implementation.

Would it be interesting to write about comparisons against Cloudflare Durable Object to the project README? Both for clarity and marketing reasons.


Thanks! Any questions in particular on the comparison?


Theory, performance, self-host option, estimated cost, etc. And I see you can deploy rivet on Cloudflare DOs. What situation does it help when we can just use wrangler?

By the way, Cloudflare DO is actually self-hostable with workerd to my knowledge, but it's not an out-of-box experience.


limited by title length XD


Nice bad story. Make up one better next time.


That you think this is made up shows how little you know about what the Chinese netizen deals with day to day.

It is very real and I am not surprised at all something exactly like what op said has happened.


What if I say I AM a Chinese netizen, right here in China Mainland talking to you?

What if I say no application on my phone ever turn my camera on without my prior approval? What if I confidently say the data privacy situation in China is not in any way worse than USA?

You say I'm censored by gov. Yeah, and so do YOU. We are quite the same, so don't laugh at each other.


If you ever allowed the app access to your camera then next time it will be able to access your camera.

No one is suggesting the app need have circumvented standard android permissions. I'm saying it is not surprising the app would try to open the camera on violation of rules.

You might be surprised to know that I do not disagree with what you said. When it comes to data privacy your information is safe from other private companies but not the government.

> You say I'm censored by gov.

When it comes to political inquiry? Without question this is more sensitive in China. My point is that in China apps are coerced to reveal information about their users to a degree where actively trying to take a picture would not be surprising, or much of an escalation. Not that it would be needed anyways since Internet usage is tied to ID.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: