Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Piezoid's commentslogin

Using a Feistel cipher and base 32 encoding at the boundaries of the system can help catching vibe coded edge code that attempt to decode identifiers in javascript. It also somewhat obfuscate the cardinalities and fill rate of the tables.

The finite-memory nondeterminism monad is like a leaky burrito.

The test suite did the heavy lifting.


L&LoL


Not a word on Palantir. Is this because of the adept wording by the ministry of justice? I highly doubt they are developing this in a vacuum.

As re reminder, In the UK Palantir holds extensive contracts across defense (multi-billion MoD deals for AI-driven battlefield and intelligence systems) and healthcare (7y £330m+ NHS Data Platform). In France, its involvement is narrower but concentrated on *domestic* intelligence.


Close floating-point subtraction loses precision: when x >> 1, sqrt(x+1) ≈ sqrt(x), so their difference suffers cancellation and end up rounding to zero. In contrast, sqrt(x+1) + sqrt(x) approaches 2*sqrt(x) smoothly.


The interstimulus interval (ISI) for vision is much longer than most flicker rates or frame intervals in displays and projectors. However flicker can be perceived through temporal aliasing. For lighting, even simple motion in the scene can reveal flicker. Waving your spread fingers in front of your eyes is a sure way to detect flicker.

What you're describing is likely saccadic masking, where the brain suppresses visual input during eye movements. It "freezes" perception just before a saccade and masks the blur, extending the perception of a "frame" up to the point in time of the sharp onset of masking. That's how you get a still of a partially illuminated frame instead of the blended together colors.

I’m no expert in this, but if you're curious, check out the Wikipedia pages on interstimulus interval, saccadic masking, chronostasis, and related research.


Why not add a pressure relief valve on the quench path with a very loud whistle? That should be enough to take care of such rare and compounded failures.

What does recall means in this context? De-energizing the superconductor and shipping it back? Seems like a waste and a planning nightmare.


A bursting disc is commonly used -- the diameter of the quench pipe is typically around 20 - 30 cm. The gas flow rates are insane; a PRV would fail and likely still not reduce the pressure inside quickly enough.

Remember, cryostats are like Russian dolls suspended on torsion wire. You want the mass of the metal inside to be as low as possible because it forms cold bridges to the outside world and increases the boil-off rate. Quenches should not happen once the magnet leaves the factory, but until that point it's not uncommon for a machine to have several "training" quenches as the (typically NbSn or NbTi) superconducting wire effectively anneals in place. A fixable giant hole in the top (with a graphite, insulating series of bursting discs) is the approach usually taken.


I do not work with MRIs, but I work next to the guys who run the NMRs (which is the ~same technology). It is my understanding that all of these super cooled magnets are designed for the eventuality of an emergency quench. Which means the machine has a direct path to evacuate the gas, and it should be piped into the building's HVAC so that if a quench does happen, the people in the area do not suffocate because of lack of oxygen.

A surprising amount of maintenance can occur while the magnets are cold and energized. My armchair-uniformed-guess is that they can replace the not-always-working relief path without venting.


I suspect this recall is precisely because someone figured that the relief path wouldn't work.


Speculation: retrieval diminished generation?


Implementations usually replace replace the 1 in the denominator with exp(-max(x)) for this reason.


There is a video by PBS Space Time on that subject: https://youtu.be/GcfLZSL7YGw


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: