This is on the front page now https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/

Your guess is worth what you paid for it.

You sound like a flat earther and a moon landing denier combined.

Justify your doubt.

You have the same problem apparently. You think it’s okay to go witch hunting and accuse people with no real evidence.

Evidently there are no experienced readers who post AI accusations.

Same weight as "there are no experienced men who'll ask a woman if she's pregnant."

Why do you care what others accuse you of?

Those aren’t good examples - that’s just LLMs living for free in your head.

As someone who had a fast high engagement for some time and then have dropped away, asking very few questions in that time, I disagree. I have seen far to many marked as duplicate for things that aren’t, nagging about rules and unsuitable questions instead of helpfulness and general allowing of some users to despise beginners without any consequences.

When I ask someone for an example, 90% just can't provide even one. From the remaining 10%, about two thirds are cases where it's very clear why the question was moderated. In another third it's questionable and can go either way.

Remember that SO is moderated by SO users.