Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Goofy_Coyote's commentslogin

It even refuses to read my resume, so... yeah

So it's essentially saying we can train models that put your jobs at risk (not saying it's correct or not), but you're not allowed to threaten our perceived moat?

These two sentences hit home:

> The flow of data was so hard to follow, it seemed like someone was trying to cover up a murder.

> Just getting the code to run on your laptop took a week.

I always thought I’m the only one having problem understanding the data flow, or setting up a proper dev environment. Impostor syndrome (and sometimes toxic environments that pushed for “velocity”) didn’t help either.

Felt good to know I’m not the one.


> Just getting the code to run on your laptop took a week.

This one surprised me. Claude Code in the CLI has made standing up an app and debugging whatever random dependencies or docker BS a dream compared to the before times, when you'd have to learn the architecture while simultaneously troubleshooting whatever isn't working on your machine


And in the before times, you learned a lot and walked away with knowledge on the deps needed, connections, .env secrets, and cleaned it all up and documented it so the next dev would have an easier time doing it.

Yeah, that totally didn't happen the majority of the time.

Yes it did. That's how I learned a great many things throughout my career. I'm sure some people didn't pay attention or try to understand what they were doing, and didn't learn. That's on them. But most of us learned a lot that way.

I think it depends on how “before” we’re talking about.

I can remember a time when learning was valued and leaving the camp cleaner than you found it was considered a basic professional standard.

But I can also remember a time when Scrum became all the rage and next thing you know we’re all stuck on the sprinting treadmill, management is obsessing over “velocity”, and it’s generally an everyone-for-themself free-for-all to clear the absolute minimum criteria to get the ticket moved to the “done” column in a semi-desperate effort to keep up with your ever-growing backlog of tickets to which you’ve been over committed. Don’t worry about incomprehensible code or flaky designs; taking your time to do it right the first time looks bad on the KPI dashboard but rework does the opposite because you get to count the second (third, fourth, etc.) times the same task needs to be revisited towards your velocity metrics, too.

I’m not sure most developers younger than maybe 40 realize just how much worse our line of work has become over the past ~15 years.


Bullshit I just pasted random shit from google in until it worked and then instantly forgot which combination of the 20 things I tried got it there.

Indeed, there were plenty of people doing just that. I imagine they get the most out of vibe coding. However, when it became a problem, an engineer was still required to fix it.

It might have been you, a couple of months later, or someone else. I have dealt with slop produced by unknowing programmers most of my career. With this vibe coding I think my job is still safe. The amount, though, is increasing exponentially.


The second tome I had to do that for the same project (new computer), I sarted taking very detailed notes when doing this kind of unpleasant, supposedly one-off things.

You're not alone on this, I've also felt the same way, and those knowledge often lives in people's heads or random slack threads, and with AI code it's even worse It just generated what looked reasonable at the time.

These Ais don't even need to arrive. They just are there. Always. Everywhere.


Seconding this.

I've seen it make the codebase vulnerable by changing the source, then claiming it found a vuln, or finding a well-defended and secure exec function, write a unit test that shows what exec does (which is running commands), then claiming a critical finding.


What happens when you leave that business account? (e.g. change jobs, leave the company, get acquired and consolidate etc)


You keep your personal account, but it goes into either a read-only or trial mode until you subscribe or connect another free account source. You can export everything out if you want to switch to a different tool.


This is very sad.

I wasn’t paying for the code tbh, I could always self-host (VaultWarden) at home behind Tailscale, it was all about the management, uptime, and most importantly, supporting a good software I used and loved for years.

Sad, really.

I’ll either move to self-hosting it at home behind TS, or going back to keepass tbh, anyway, I’m not staying on a sinking ship.

P.S: VaultWarden had a few bad CVEs this year (like an Auth Bypass), but when I looked deeper, it wouldn’t have much of a negative effect on me as a self-hosted home user that shares everything with family.


Chuck Norris once slapped Pi so hard it became rational for a moment.

RIP dude, we’d continue the jokes, may your soul laughs as hard as we do.

Chuck Norris once bet 42 is a prime. He won.


Sorry, but these Chuck Norris jokes are more like Bruce Schneier facts: https://www.schneierfacts.com/


I used to love the Schneierfacts, I mean I still do, but I used to as well.

They were obviously a bit more niche, but that made them funnier to my mind.

> For Bruce Schneier, all zeros of the Riemann zeta function are trivial.


Oh! I didn't know that was a thing! hahaha love it!


It took me too long to understand it’s satire. BP went through stratosphere before I noticed.

Let’s hope one of these fake AI grifters doesn’t take this as a serious idea, raised a couple hundred million, and do real damage.

(I’m not against AI, I just don’t like nonsense either in tech, or people)


Very interesting idea, love the simplicity.

Question about this:

“Threads are positioned in the timeline by the original post’s created_at; replies within a thread are sorted by their own created_at ascending.”

Does this mean, I, as the person replying to the post can manipulate my reply time to say, 3 minutes before person X’s reply?

If so, I can imagine a few adversarial ways of (ab)using this.

I understand this is more for friend groups, just curious if my understanding is correct.


Yes that's correct.

edit: I guess an easy fix is to append a cryptographic hash to the post ID, but yeah currently I'm assuming you trust your friends.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: